Clarifying two terms that are often used interchangeably. Last reviewed June 2026.
An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and a Risk Management and Monitoring Program (RMMP) are closely related documents built on the same risk-management framework — both are used to demonstrate compliance with Victoria's General Environmental Duty under the Environment Protection Act 2017. The key difference is context: an RMMP is the specific document that certain EPA permission conditions require licence and permit holders to prepare, while EMP is the broader term for a documented environmental management system that any business can use to show how it manages risk — whether or not it holds a permission.
A Risk Management and Monitoring Program is a document that records how a permission holder proposes to minimise risks of harm to human health or the environment, in accordance with the General Environmental Duty. EPA Victoria's guidance, Preparing a risk management and monitoring program, sets out the expected framework.
Certain EPA permissions carry a condition requiring an RMMP. These include conditions on operating licences, development licences, pilot project licences, permits, and authorisations of discharge and disposal. The RMMP must generally be documented in writing, signed by an authorised officer of the business, and made available to EPA on request.
An important point EPA itself makes: complying with an RMMP permission condition does not automatically mean a business is complying with the General Environmental Duty. The RMMP is how compliance is demonstrated — but the duty to actually minimise risk so far as reasonably practicable stands on its own.
An Environmental Management Plan is the broader document that sets out how a business identifies, controls and monitors environmental risk at a site. It serves as both a working management system and a regulator-facing record. An EMP uses the same backbone as an RMMP — site description, conceptual site model, risk assessment, controls, performance objectives, monitoring, incident response and review — and is the natural document where compliance needs to be demonstrated but a specific RMMP permission condition is not the trigger (for example, when responding to an EPA notice, or proactively managing the General Environmental Duty). See What is an EMP? for the full picture.
In practice, EMPs and RMMPs share the same structure. Both are built around the EPA's risk-management process:
Because the frameworks align so closely, a well-prepared plan can often serve either purpose — a permission condition or a broader duty — provided it is scoped correctly from the outset.
They are closely related but not identical. An RMMP is the specific risk-and-monitoring document required by certain EPA permission conditions. An EMP is the broader term for a documented environmental management system. Both demonstrate compliance with the General Environmental Duty and share the same risk-management framework.
Not automatically. EPA is explicit that complying with an RMMP permission condition does not, on its own, mean a business is complying with the General Environmental Duty. The RMMP documents and demonstrates compliance, but the duty to genuinely minimise risk applies independently.
Conditions requiring an RMMP appear on permissions such as operating licences, development licences, pilot project licences, permits, and authorisations of discharge and disposal. The conditions on the specific permission should be checked.
Yes. Because EMPs and RMMPs share the same underlying framework, a consultant experienced in Victorian EPA requirements can prepare whichever document the situation calls for.
Related reading: What is an EMP? · Do I need an EMP? · Where to get an EMP
This article is general information, not legal advice. EPA guidance does not impose compliance obligations and is not a statement of the law. Professional advice should be obtained for specific circumstances.